Category Archives: Unsolved Murders

She Found a Bone While Walking Her Dog. Then Police Found 11 Women.

By Chester Moore

Most people walk into parks, trails and open country looking for something positive.

Maybe it’s a few miles of exercise, a chance to photograph wildlife or simply an opportunity to get away from traffic and noise. Hikers look for overlooks. Hunters notice tracks. Birders watch the trees. Those of us who have spent our lives outdoors develop a habit of looking at the ground for tracks, sheds, feathers and anything else that catches our attention.

Christine Ross was simply walking her dog, Ruca, across Albuquerque’s West Mesa on Feb. 2, 2009, when something caught her attention.

It was a bone protruding from an earthen trail.

Ross photographed it and sent the image to her sister, a registered nurse, who thought it looked like a human femur. Ross contacted the Albuquerque Police Department, and investigators soon confirmed the bone was human.

Then they started searching.

Police searching at the site.

What they eventually uncovered was almost incomprehensible. The skeletal remains of 11 women and an unborn child had been buried in makeshift graves across the mesa.

An ordinary walk outdoors had led directly into what became the largest crime scene in Albuquerque history.

For anyone who hikes, camps, hunts, fishes or explores remote country, there is something particularly disturbing about that.

When a Trail Becomes a Crime Scene

I’ve spent much of my life exploring places most people would consider remote, and one of the things I’ve learned is that wild and undeveloped landscapes can conceal things remarkably well.

Anyone who has tried to follow a blood trail through thick brush understands how quickly something can disappear. Hunters sometimes walk within yards of a downed deer without seeing it. A backpack dropped into thick vegetation can vanish from sight. An abandoned vehicle can sit surprisingly close to a road while trees and brush make it almost invisible.

Now imagine what time can do.

Vegetation grows. Rain moves soil. Wind changes exposed ground. Animals disturb objects and remains. Trails appear and disappear. Development changes access to places that were once isolated.

The outdoors doesn’t care whether something is evidence.

It simply keeps changing.

That’s one reason wilderness and undeveloped areas can become incredibly difficult crime scenes. A person can disappear into country that doesn’t look particularly intimidating on a map and become extraordinarily difficult to locate.

The West Mesa case demonstrates that in the darkest possible way.

They Were Beneath the Landscape

The remains discovered during the West Mesa investigation belonged to Monica Candelaria, Victoria Chavez, Virginia Cloven, Syllannia Edwards, Cinnamon Elks, Doreen Marquez, Julie Nieto, Veronica Romero, Evelyn Salazar, Michelle Valdez and Jamie Barela. Valdez was pregnant, and the remains of her unborn child were recovered with her.

Two of the victims, Syllannia Edwards and Jamie Barela, were only 15 years old.

These women had disappeared years before Christine Ross walked across the mesa with Ruca. Police believe their deaths were homicides, but the person responsible has never been identified.

That means people had undoubtedly passed through the broader landscape without realizing what was there.

I find that aspect of the case almost as disturbing as the discovery itself.

We tend to think that if something terrible happened near a trail, park or outdoor recreation area, somebody would notice. Surely a hiker would see something. Maybe a hunter would stumble across evidence or someone walking a dog would smell or notice something unusual.

Sometimes that happens.

Sometimes it takes years.

Why Remote Places Attract More Than Outdoorsmen

Isolation is one of the things we seek when we go outdoors.

It’s why people backpack into wilderness areas instead of walking around city blocks. It’s why hunters travel deep into national forests and why fishermen launch boats into places where they won’t see another person all morning.

We want solitude.

Unfortunately, there are people who seek isolation for very different reasons.

I’ve written before about the importance of paying attention to unusual human activity in remote country. I once stumbled into an area associated with a meth lab, and that experience permanently changed the way I view certain signs in the woods.

The overwhelming majority of people you encounter outdoors are simply doing the same thing you are. They’re hiking, fishing, hunting, camping, working or enjoying the land.

But criminals understand geography, too.

A secluded road can provide privacy. An isolated trail means fewer witnesses. Undeveloped property can offer places where vehicles aren’t immediately noticed. Deserts, forests and swamps can conceal evidence in ways an urban environment cannot.

That’s not a reason to be frightened every time you enter the woods.

It’s a reason to pay attention.

Hikers Find Things

There’s an interesting reality surrounding outdoor recreation that doesn’t receive much attention.

Hikers, hunters, fishermen and other outdoorsmen sometimes become accidental evidence finders.

Think about where we go.

Hunters deliberately leave established trails and move through brush where most people never walk. Shed hunters spend hours staring at the ground searching for pieces of bone. Anglers follow creeks into isolated areas. Wildlife photographers explore places where animals concentrate. Hikers investigate old trails, overlooks and forgotten roads.

We’re looking at places other people aren’t.

That’s why outdoorsmen occasionally discover abandoned vehicles, clothing, weapons, personal belongings and human remains associated with missing-person and criminal investigations.

Most of the bones you find outdoors will obviously belong to wildlife. Deer remains are common in many areas. So are hogs, livestock and countless smaller animals.

But every once in a while, someone realizes the bone they’re looking at doesn’t belong to an animal.

At that point, everything changes.

Don’t Become the Investigator

If you ever encounter something outdoors that you genuinely believe could be human remains, your job isn’t to solve the mystery.

Don’t start collecting bones.

Don’t rearrange objects so you can photograph them better. Don’t search pockets, move clothing or start digging to see whether anything else is underneath.

Leave the scene as you found it and contact law enforcement.

There are several reasons for this.

First, you may be looking at a crime scene. Objects that appear completely insignificant could have evidentiary value investigators understand better than you do.

Second, where something is located can matter as much as the object itself. Moving evidence destroys information about its original position.

And finally, you don’t know what happened there.

An isolated set of remains could belong to someone who became lost or suffered a medical emergency. It could be a suicide, accident or homicide. Until investigators determine what occurred, treating the location carefully protects both the investigation and the person whose remains you’ve discovered.

Take note of where you are so authorities can find the location, back away and make the call from somewhere safe.

What Else Is Still Out There?

The West Mesa case contains another element that should interest anyone who spends time in wild or undeveloped country.

Investigators have identified additional missing women they believe could potentially be connected to the case.

That raises an obvious and unsettling question.

Could there be another burial site?

Police have conducted searches in other areas during the years since the original discovery, but the murders remain unsolved.

That’s one of the harsh realities of missing-person investigations involving outdoor environments. Searchers can cover enormous areas and still miss something.

I’ve participated in enough outdoor activities to understand how deceptive terrain can be. You can look across an open area and think you can see everything, but depressions, vegetation and changes in elevation create countless blind spots.

Put the same problem into thick timber, mountainous terrain or swamp and the difficulty increases dramatically.

Searching isn’t simply walking through an area and looking around.

Sometimes what you’re searching for is only feet away and still invisible.

A Dog Found What Everyone Else Had Missed

That’s why I keep coming back to Ruca.

A dog walking across the mesa noticed something protruding from the ground.

That one discovery changed everything.

Had Christine Ross taken another route that day, someone else might eventually have found the remains. Development might have exposed them. Weather could have uncovered additional evidence.

But we don’t know when that would have happened.

A memorial to the women of West Mesa.

The landscape had already concealed the victims for years.

Today, the burial area has been transformed. Albuquerque dedicated Women’s Memorial Park there in 2020, creating a place that remembers the women whose remains were discovered beneath the mesa.

Their names deserve to be remembered: Monica Candelaria, Victoria Chavez, Virginia Cloven, Syllannia Edwards, Cinnamon Elks, Doreen Marquez, Julie Nieto, Veronica Romero, Evelyn Salazar, Michelle Valdez and Jamie Barela.

They weren’t simply part of a famous crime scene.

They were people.

Remember This the Next Time You’re on a Trail

I don’t tell stories like West Mesa to make people afraid of parks, trails or wild places.

Quite the opposite. I’ve devoted my life to getting people outdoors.

But I also believe outdoorsmen should understand the environments we enter, including the darker possibilities.

Pay attention to what you see.

If you encounter an abandoned pack in an unusual location, don’t immediately start rummaging through it. If you find clothing or personal belongings scattered somewhere that doesn’t make sense, remember the location. If you discover something that could be human remains, don’t disturb it.

And if you encounter human activity in remote country that seems completely inconsistent with the location, there’s nothing wrong with turning around.

Most strange things we encounter outdoors have innocent explanations. Most bones belong to animals. Most abandoned objects are simply trash somebody should have carried out.

But “most” isn’t “all.”

On Feb. 2, 2009, Christine Ross went outside with her dog for a walk.

Ruca found a bone.

Police eventually found 11 women and an unborn child.

It’s difficult to imagine a darker reminder that sometimes the landscape beneath our hiking boots contains stories we cannot see.

Chester Moore

Follow Chester Moore on the following social media platforms

Chester Moore’s YouTube.

@thechestermoore on Instagram

@gulfgreatwhitesharksociety on Instagram

To support the efforts of Higher Calling Wildlife® click here.

Subscribe to the Dark Outdoors podcast on all major podcasting platforms.

Higher Calling Wildlife on Facebook

Email Chester at chester@chestermoore.com.

What the Nancy Guthrie Case May Reveal About the Next Generation of Predators (Part One)

The first thing that caught my attention about the Nancy Guthrie case wasn’t that she disappeared.

Sadly, America sees missing person cases every day. Most never become national news. This one did because Guthrie is the mother of NBC “Today” co-anchor Savannah Guthrie. Like millions of Americans, I followed the headlines as investigators searched for answers. But as more information became public, it wasn’t the celebrity connection that kept drawing me back to the story.

It was the setting.

During one of the first media briefings, investigators mentioned the rugged desert surrounding Guthrie’s home. There was even discussion of mountain lions and coyotes. Having spent more than three decades covering wildlife and dangerous situations in the outdoors, that immediately struck me as odd. A mountain lion attack doesn’t simply erase someone. It leaves unmistakable evidence. From everything investigators were saying, it was obvious this was something entirely different.

Then I pulled up aerial maps of the neighborhood.

I found myself studying the winding roads, the homes backed against open desert and the natural terrain surrounding the community. Instead of looking at the case only through the lens of a missing person investigation, I began looking at the landscape itself. What advantages might it offer someone intent on committing a crime? What challenges would it create for investigators trying to reconstruct what happened?

Those questions led me to invite Daniel, host of the Drunk Turkey Show and a former law enforcement officer, to join me on Dark Outdoors. His program has closely followed the Guthrie investigation, and I wanted to hear his perspective on something that had been bothering me since I first saw the maps.

Listen to the Dark Outdoors® interview with Daniel from the Drunk Turkey Show:

Did the location itself help whoever committed this crime?

“I think it could have been an advantage to the person,” Daniel said. “The area definitely was an advantage to the guy.” He pointed to several factors that stood out immediately, including the neighborhood’s somewhat rural character, less-than-ideal cellular coverage and the darkness surrounding the community.

The Catalina Foothills community.

That answer immediately changed the direction of our conversation.

Most public discussions surrounding high-profile criminal investigations focus on suspects, motives or forensic evidence. Daniel instead focused on geography. Before talking about who might have committed the crime, he talked about why this particular place may have appealed to someone willing to commit it.

One aspect of the neighborhood especially caught his attention.

“They don’t have any corner lights,” Daniel said. “It’s super dark.”

He believes those conditions suggest whoever committed the crime may have possessed a familiarity with the area that extended beyond simply driving through it.

“That’s one of the things that makes me feel like the guy’s somewhat familiar with the area, whether that’s he’s from the area or he did a certain amount of surveillance in the area,” Daniel said.

That observation shouldn’t be confused with evidence identifying a suspect. Daniel wasn’t claiming investigators had reached that conclusion. He was explaining how experienced investigators often begin evaluating a crime scene. They study the environment. They look at access routes, visibility, lighting and how someone could move into and out of an area without attracting attention.

Listening to him reminded me of something I’ve noticed while reporting on outdoor-related crime over the last three decades.

Some of the most challenging investigations I’ve covered haven’t unfolded deep in the wilderness or in the middle of crowded cities. They’ve occurred in those places where neighborhoods blend into natural landscapes—desert communities, wooded subdivisions, greenbelts and trail systems where people seek peace, privacy and a connection with the outdoors. Most of those places are incredibly safe. But when someone with evil intentions understands the terrain better than everyone else, the landscape itself can become an advantage.

Daniel pointed to another factor that deserves consideration.

From what he understands, cellular coverage in portions of the area isn’t ideal. That, he said, could make it more difficult to narrow the location of devices or reconstruct movements during critical moments of the investigation. At the same time, he noted the neighborhood is not isolated wilderness. It contains numerous homes and regular vehicle traffic, making the investigative picture even more complicated.

That complexity is one reason the Guthrie case has remained so compelling. Cases like this remind us that modern investigations rarely depend on one piece of evidence. Instead, detectives assemble hundreds or even thousands of small details until they begin forming a clearer picture of what happened.

As our discussion continued, however, Daniel shifted away from geography and began talking about something that immediately caught my attention.

Technology.

Not technology used by investigators.

Technology that may have been understood—or even used—by whoever committed the crime.

That immediately made me think of another case that forever changed how many investigators look at modern offenders.

Bryan Kohberger.

The man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students wasn’t simply another homicide suspect. Prosecutors allege he attempted to minimize the digital trail surrounding the crime, altered his driving route afterward and possessed an academic interest in criminal investigations. Ultimately, investigators used a combination of DNA, surveillance footage and digital evidence to build the case against him.

Whether Kohberger intended it or not, that investigation demonstrated something important.

Today’s offenders aren’t just learning how to commit crimes.

Some appear to be learning how investigators solve them.

I asked Daniel whether he believed we may be witnessing a new generation of offenders—people who understand cameras, digital evidence and modern investigative techniques better than many criminals of the past.

His answer surprised me.

He said what first pushed him in that direction wasn’t one dramatic piece of evidence. It was a collection of small details that, when viewed together, painted a very different picture.

He pointed to a camera system that appeared to record activity before and after a critical period but not during it. He mentioned reports that multiple nearby homes experienced internet issues that night. He noted what he believed was an individual who appeared aware of where cameras were positioned and how they functioned. None of those observations establish what happened or identify a suspect, but together they caused him to begin looking at the case through a different lens.

As Daniel laid out his reasoning, I realized we were no longer discussing only the Nancy Guthrie investigation.

We were talking about whether violent offenders themselves may be evolving.

For decades, crime stories have often portrayed killers as impulsive or reckless. Increasingly, some investigators are confronting offenders who study forensic science, understand digital technology, research investigative procedures and attempt to anticipate how law enforcement will respond. Cases like Kohberger’s suggest that possibility is no longer theoretical.

Then Daniel made another observation that stopped me.

He believes there may be one more piece to the puzzle in the Guthrie case—one that could push this conversation even further into the modern age.

It wasn’t another witness.

It wasn’t DNA.

It wasn’t a cellphone.

It was the possibility that the person responsible may have understood technology in ways most people haven’t even considered.

That discussion led us into cameras, internet disruptions and one possibility that sounds more like something from a crime thriller than a real investigation.

A drone.

Next: Part Two — Cameras, Drones and the Rise of the High-Tech Predator.

Chester Moore

Follow Chester Moore on the following social media platforms

Chester Moore’s YouTube.

@thechestermoore on Instagram

@gulfgreatwhitesharksociety on Instagram

To support the efforts of Higher Calling Wildlife® click here.

Subscribe to the Dark Outdoors podcast on all major podcasting platforms.

Higher Calling Wildlife on Facebook

Email Chester at chester@chestermoore.com.

The Unsolved Murder Of Dannariah Finley

On July 4, 2002, what should have been a day of celebration became one of the darkest days in the history of my hometown of Orange, TX.

Four-year-old Dannarriah Finley disappeared while sleeping alongside her siblings and cousins at her mother’s home. Three days later, her body was found approximately 27 miles away near a dredge pipeline ditch off State Highway 82 on Pleasure Island in Port Arthur.

Listen to the podcast here.

🎧 Listen to “The Little Girl on the Island: The Unsolved Murder of Dannarriah Finley” wherever you get your podcasts.

Episode On Apple Podcasts

Dark Outdoors Podcast Linktree

Twenty-four years later, her murder remains unsolved.

Today, advances in DNA technology continue to give investigators hope, and those who have worked this case believe it can still be solved. That is one reason I’m bringing Dannarriah’s story to Dark Outdoors. Every unsolved case deserves continued attention, and perhaps someone reading or listening today remembers something they didn’t realize could matter.

The Outdoors Sometimes Become Part of Criminal Investigations

Dark Outdoors was created to explore the places where nature and mystery intersect.

Most of us think of the outdoors as a place of peace. It’s where we fish, hunt, hike, photograph wildlife, paddle quiet waterways, or simply escape the noise of everyday life. Those are the experiences that draw millions of people outdoors every year.

Unfortunately, the outdoors also sometimes becomes part of criminal investigations. Places like islands, beaches, forests and desert washes are popular dumping grounds for killers.

These locations have appeared in countless investigations across America, not because there is anything sinister about them, but because criminals sometimes believe secluded places will hide evidence and delay discovery.

History has shown that assumption is often wrong.

One of the most well-known examples in recent years is the Gilgo Beach investigation on Long Island, New York. For years, multiple victims were discovered along a remote stretch of coastline. The investigation eventually led to the arrest of Rex Heuermann, demonstrating once again that cold cases can move forward through patient investigative work, advancing forensic science and the determination of law enforcement.

Every case is different, and Dannarriah’s case stands on its own. But one lesson remains universal:

Time does not always protect those responsible.

A Horror Close to Home

Dannarriah’s murder wasn’t just another headline to me.

She was a little girl from my hometown, and the place where her body was found is somewhere I’ve fished since I was a child.

Pleasure Island has always been one of my favorite places along the upper Texas coast. I’ve spent countless mornings there chasing speckled trout and redfish, photographing birds and simply enjoying one of the most unique coastal landscapes in our region.

Nothing about this case changes how beautiful that place is.

The island didn’t commit this crime.

Someone did.

That’s an important distinction because I never want people to fear the outdoors itself. Nature isn’t responsible for acts of violence. Yet tragedies like this remind us that human evil sometimes finds its way into places that should represent peace and recreation.

Every time I visit Pleasure Island, I think about Dannarriah.

I think about her family.

I think about the investigators who have never given up.

And I think about how one piece of information could finally provide the answers they’ve sought for more than two decades.

Hope Through Technology and Through People

Recently retired Texas Ranger Brandon Bess has spoken publicly about the remarkable advances in DNA technology that continue giving investigators hope.

He noted that today’s forensic capabilities are dramatically more advanced than they were when Dannarriah disappeared in 2002. Evidence that once yielded few answers may someday reveal far more through continually evolving scientific techniques.

But Bess also emphasized something equally important.

Technology alone probably won’t solve this case.

People will.

While preparing for my Dark Outdoors podcast episode on Dannarriah’s case, I also spoke with a law enforcement source familiar with the investigation. While they understandably could not discuss specific details, they expressed cautious optimism that investigators have developed compelling leads over the years involving a very limited number of individuals.

The challenge has never been simply developing suspicions.

The challenge is building the kind of evidence that will withstand the scrutiny required in court.

That takes time.

Sometimes it takes decades.

But history has repeatedly shown that patience, persistence and advancing forensic science can eventually bring justice.

Outdoor Enthusiasts Can Make a Difference

One lesson I’ve learned during decades covering wildlife and conservation is that hunters, anglers, photographers, hikers and birdwatchers often notice details that others miss.

A vehicle parked where it shouldn’t be.

A boat operating at an unusual hour.

Someone entering an isolated area without an obvious reason.

Most of those observations never amount to anything.

Occasionally, however, they become exactly what investigators need.

That’s why I encourage everyone who spends time outdoors to remain observant.

Trust your instincts.

If something seems unusual, report it.

You don’t have to investigate it yourself. You don’t have to know whether it’s important. That’s law enforcement’s job.

But one phone call can sometimes become the missing piece in an investigation.

Keeping Dannarriah’s Story Alive

More than twenty-four years have passed since Dannarriah Finley disappeared.

Her family still deserves answers.

Her community still remembers.

Investigators are still working.

And there is still reason to hope.

One of the goals of Dark Outdoors is to shine a light on stories that deserve continued attention. Sometimes that means exploring dangerous wildlife. Sometimes it means examining strange mysteries. Other times, it means remembering victims whose stories should never be forgotten.

I hope this article and the accompanying podcast episode keeps Dannarriah’s name in the public conversation.

Perhaps someone reading this remembers a conversation.

Perhaps someone recalls seeing something unusual.

Perhaps advances in DNA technology will finally reveal what investigators have searched for over the last two decades.

Whatever the path, I hope justice comes for Dannarriah Finley and for everyone who has loved and missed her.

Listen to the Podcast

In the latest episode of Dark Outdoors®, I take a deeper look at the Dannarriah Finley investigation, discuss the role remote outdoor locations sometimes play in criminal investigations, explore advances in DNA technology, and examine why investigators still believe this case can be solved.

🎧 Listen to “The Little Girl on the Island: The Unsolved Murder of Dannarriah Finley” wherever you get your podcasts.

Episode Apple Podcasts Link Here.

Dark Outdoors Linktree to Various Podcast Platforms

Chester Moore

Follow Chester Moore on the following social media platforms

Chester Moore’s YouTube.

@thechestermoore on Instagram

@gulfgreatwhitesharksociety on Instagram

To support the efforts of Higher Calling Wildlife® click here.

Subscribe to the Dark Outdoors podcast on all major podcasting platforms.

Higher Calling Wildlife on Facebook

Email Chester at chester@chestermoore.com.